As a state representative in 1983, Peter Courtney introduced legislation to lower the drunken-driving threshold from 0.10 blood alcohol content to 0.08.

It was a radical move from a new lawmaker who was expected to bide his time. Courtney had little support outside of a budding advocacy group called Mothers Against Drunk Driving, but he introduced the bill anyway.

It passed and Oregon and Utah became the first states to move to a 0.08 threshold for drunken driving. Courtney proved to be ahead of the times, as it wasn’t until 1998 that President Bill Clinton called on all states to enact the 0.08 standard.

Now Courtney wants Oregon to be a leader again. He is taking the political point to push Oregon to an even lower limit — 0.05.

Peter Courtney

Oregon Senate President Peter Courtney wants to lower the threshold for drunken driving.

“You’re not as good after you drink as you are before you drink,” the Senate president said.

Today, Courtney said, drivers are confronted in their cars with more lights and screens than ever. Add in bike lanes and homeless people walking around at night, and there is too much distraction while driving something that can be used as a deadly weapon, he said.

The Salem Democrat knows his proposal will be unpopular.

“Sooner or later, you’re going to have to fight that battle,” Courtney said. “You don’t wait until the timing’s perfect. You don’t wait until everything lines up.”

Courtney said he’s always been keenly aware of the downsides of alcohol, which has killed several chronic drinkers in his family. But this isn’t about drinking, it’s about safety, he said.

“I’m not trying to stop you from drinking,” Courtney said. “I’m not trying to stop this explosion of brew pubs. Go, all of you. Go tonight, go every night. I’m not trying to make a statement about drinking.”

Utah is the only state with such a standard, which went into effect in December after nearly two years of hot debate and pushback from the restaurant industry, citizens and some lawmakers.

That was in teetotalling Utah, where the religious beliefs of two-thirds of the state mandate they abstain from alcohol. It was even fought before a Mormon-dominated Legislature, prompting former state Sen. Jim Dabakis to famously drink two mimosas before a floor speech to show he wasn’t impaired.

So far, Courtney is missing crucial allies.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving so far isn’t endorsing the Courtney move and the Oregon State Police are neutral on the idea. Capt. Tim Fox said there is no research on the difference of impairment at 0.05 and 0.08. Superintendent Travis Hampton said if the new limit were to pass, state police wouldn’t have enough troopers to enforce the new law.

Courtney is undeterred.

“I’ll be talking with him,” Courtney said of Hampton.

And that’s the law enforcement and anti-drunk driving community. Oregon also has robust wine, craft beer, spirits and restaurant industries with powerful lobbies.

Greg Astley, the government affairs director for the Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association, said the proposal misses the mark, saying a 120-pound woman could get arrested for having one glass of wine after work.

Courtney’s office says it would take a 160-pound man three drinks in an hour to get to 0.05. He also points to the National Transportation Safety Board, which has been promoting 0.05 since 2013, which says someone between 0.05 and 0.079 blood alcohol content is seven times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash than a sober driver.

A University of Chicago study based on data from international countries with a 0.05 limit estimated 1,790 lives would be saved each year if all states adopted the limit. In 2016, there were 2,636 crashes involving drinking, causing 154 deaths.

Drivers can be cited for being under the influence of less than 0.08 but the penalties are less severe. In 2017, of the 4,671 DUII arrests, 184 drivers registered less than 0.08, according to state police data.

The penalties that apply to the current limit would also be linked to the lower limit under Courtney’s proposed legislation. That means drivers involved in fatal accidents who are found to be impaired at the 0.05 level could face negligent homicide charges.

Astley said reducing the limit could make people fearful of going to happy hour or ordering a drink with dinner. Meanwhile, he said, there are more and more people under the influence of marijuana getting behind the wheel.

“It seems like this bill is trying to zero in on a very narrow subset of people that under current law wouldn’t be impaired,” he said.

But Courtney said this increased regulation is part of the progression of society. With ride-sharing apps like Uber and Lyft, it’s easier than ever to not drive after drinking. It’s a practice he’s started himself.

In recent years, New York, Delaware, Hawaii and Washington state considered but rejected moves to the lower limit.

Courtney acknowledged that may be the fate his idea endures in Oregon.

“Well alright then, I’ll lose, but I’m still not pulling the bill,” he said.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.