Electoral College

Vice President Joe Biden presents an Electoral College ballot as House Speaker Paul Ryan watches during a joint session of Congress in January 2017 to certify Donald Trump’s presidential victory.

A few weeks ago, state Sen. Betsy Johnson of Scappoose took to the Senate floor and pointed out the irony within a proposal to change how Oregon helps elect our nation’s president.

Senate Bill 870 would require that Oregon’s votes in the Electoral College be cast for whoever wins the national popular vote for president, regardless of the election outcome in Oregon. Supporters of that legislation say they believe in “one person, one vote,” yet they don’t want to send the proposed election change to the voters.

That rankled Johnson. “If we’re going to change how we’re going to elect the president of the United States, it should be referred to the ballot,” she told her fellow senators.

We agree.

A majority of her colleagues disagreed. The bill passed the Senate 17-12 and now is in the House, where the Rules Committee approved it this week on a party-line vote with no discussion. It could go to the House floor next week for final action.

The House passed similar bills in previous years, only to see them disappear in the Senate. This year, advocates started in the Senate, where the increased number of liberal Democratic senators ensured passage.

Our nation’s founders created a process in which electors — now referred to as the Electoral College, a term that does not appear in the Constitution — choose the president and vice president. This arrangement was an 18th-century compromise between Congress electing the president and having the people do so. It also gave a greater voice to smaller states, although advocates of National Popular Vote say that no longer applies.

The Electoral College has proved controversial, to say the least. Through the centuries, more than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform or eliminate the Electoral College. The impetus stems in large part from five presidents — including two of the past three — losing the popular vote but winning the presidency via the Electoral College.

That is how Republicans Donald Trump and George W. Bush came to occupy the White House instead of Democrats Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Al Gore in 2000. The other three, in case you’re wondering, are presidents Benjamin Harrison (1888), Rutherford B. Hayes (1876) and John Quincy Adams (1824).

Democrat Johnson recalled that recent history in her floor speech.

“There are two words not mentioned in Senate Bill 870: Donald Trump. In my opinion, he’s the reason the National Popular Vote has caught on so aggressively of late,” she said. “If we’re going to end an historic institution, let it be prompted by something loftier than dislike for one particular president.

“Let regular voters make that decision, not the Legislature.”

SB 870 would add Oregon to the 14 states, plus the District of Columbia, that have adopted the “Interstate Compact for Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote.”

If Oregon joined, participating jurisdictions would have a collective total of 196 electoral votes. The compact will become legally binding once enough more states have joined to reach an Electoral College majority — 270 votes.

The Electoral College comprises 538 electors. Each state has as many electors as it does U.S. senators and members of the U.S. House of Representatives, giving Oregon seven electors. And under the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated three electors.

Like most other states, Oregon has required its electors to cast their Electoral College ballots for whichever presidential candidate wins the popular vote in their own state, regardless of what happened nationally.

Feelings run strong on both sides of the issue. Advocates of National Popular Vote consider the Electoral College an anachronism from an era in which the white male elite made all the decisions. They contend the current system disenfranchises members of political minorities — for example, Republicans in Oregon, Democrats in Idaho — because such states are predictably blue or red in presidential races.

Opponents warn that Americans should be very wary of tinkering with the U.S. Constitution, even in a roundabout way. They say the change would make it even less likely that presidential candidates would personally campaign in Oregon or other small states. They also argue that presidential elections would be effectively decided once East Coast voters cast their ballots three time zones ahead of the West Coast, making our votes irrelevant.

In any case, the Legislature should heed the words of Sen. Johnson. If lawmakers believe Oregon should join the National Popular Vote movement, then put the measure on the 2020 statewide primary election ballot.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.