The Clatsop County Board of Commissioners has correctly identified the most important policy issues facing the North Coast — housing, a new jail, mental health, child care — but has often missed opportunities to lead.

Part of the problem is commissioners get distracted by infighting, procedural squabbles and other detours and let their focus drift.

You might not know it from the campaign flyers in your mailbox, but the county commission is nonpartisan. Commissioners set policy and supervise the county manager, who executes day-to-day operations and an $84 million budget.

We don’t fault political parties and interest groups for trying to influence elections — we are First Amendment purists — but we have a different hope for our local boards.

Ideally, in our view, the county commission should be more like a jury: open-minded, objective and drawn from a cross section of our community.

All four candidates for the May election — who interviewed remotely with The Astorian’s editorial board via GoToMeeting because of the coronavirus pandemic — have the kind of backgrounds and qualities we prefer.

Our endorsements are based on who we believe has the potential to be more effective over the next four years, as well as the mix of voices necessary to shape better public policy.

District 2

We endorse Commissioner Sarah Nebeker in District 2, which covers Gearhart, Clatsop Plains and portions of Seaside and Warrenton.

First elected in 2012, Nebeker has carved out a place on the county commission over two terms as an advocate for the arts and social services.

The Arts Council of Clatsop County helped with a national study released in 2017 that put a dollar figure on the impact of the nonprofit arts and culture sector on the North Coast. Nebeker, who was married to the late painter, Royal Nebeker, said in a statement at the time that through the “evidence-based study, we can grow the arts, a clean industry, in Clatsop County.”

She is a consistent voice for improvements at Clatsop Behavioral Healthcare, the county’s mental health contractor.

“I have a track record of making improvements in our services, in public health, mental health,” she said of her pitch to voters. “I have advocated strongly with our state and national representatives for better education for our youth and for the arts, because that is an important part of our education and brain development.

“I have worked towards making a better environment for living-wage jobs.”

We commend Nebeker for trying to change the tone during her year as board chairwoman in 2019, but we disagreed with her insistence that bringing in a parliamentarian was necessary to enforce order. The move was a distraction that undermined longtime County Counsel Heather Reynolds.

We also wish Nebeker didn’t wait until she was running for reelection to publicly stand behind her vote in 2017 to opt Clatsop County out of a $1 billion lawsuit against the state over timber harvests. The 3-2 vote came under a harsh spotlight after other timber counties won last year in Linn County Circuit Court, but the state plans to appeal.

While the vote looks shaky in hindsight, many of the people who testified before the county commission at the time wanted the county to opt out in favor of more balanced forest management.

We are also perplexed Nebeker declined to take a position on cap and trade. The issue should not preoccupy the county commission — it will rightfully be decided by the state Legislature — but most counties took a side. Two Clatsop County commissioners — Mark Kujala and Lianne Thompson — wrote letters of opposition.

John Toyooka, a manager at Lum’s Auto Center, is making his first run for elected office. The U.S. Marine Corps veteran has served on the foundation boards of Clatsop Community College and Providence Seaside Hospital.

His priorities would be improving the county’s infrastructure and long-term planning.

Toyooka believes the county should have participated in the timber lawsuit and opposed cap and trade to protect industry on the North Coast.

His business experience would be an asset in county budget deliberations. We hope he continues to pursue public service.

District 4

We endorse Courtney Bangs in District 4, which covers eastern Astoria to Westport.

The Knappa preschool teacher and mother of three would bring a new perspective to the county commission on issues like child care and the balance between work and family.

Her energy could help call attention to often-overlooked rural communities and improve engagement.

With no prior government experience, she would need to quickly learn the nuances of the county’s budget given the expected financial fallout from the coronavirus.

“I just feel like new blood, new perspective, new experiences, might shake things up and get things done,” she said.

There are some red flags, though.

When Bangs announced her campaign last year, she spoke mostly about cap and trade and the timber lawsuit and sounded like a protest sign at a #TimberUnity rally. While that may have been smart politics, given the makeup of the district, we think it would be a step backward if that is her mission.

The county commission can — and sometimes should — get involved in regional and statewide issues, but we would like commissioners to sharpen their focus locally.

Commissioner Kathleen Sullivan, who was chosen as board chairwoman in January, is campaigning for reelection after running unopposed in 2016.

She has shown a diligent, methodical approach to policy. Thrown into the unexpected role of presiding over the board during a pandemic, she has ably handled the responsibility.

Her interest in expanding broadband in rural communities has taken on urgency as the physical isolation over the virus illustrates disparities in access.

Sullivan and Thompson strayed too far in the clash with the former county manager over whether commissioners should have a greater say in day-to-day operations. While the debate exposed the county manager’s leadership weaknesses, the issue faded after his retirement and now feels like wasted motion.

Like Nebeker, Sullivan waited until she was running for reelection to publicly stand behind her vote to opt out of the timber lawsuit.

We also think Sullivan should have a more robust answer on cap and trade — she said it is a state, not county, issue — given she knew Bangs and others would make it a campaign theme.

Overall, we see Sullivan as someone who got involved in public service for the right reasons and has thoughtful ideas to contribute. We trust, if she is not reelected, she will find a way to serve the North Coast.

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Barry Plotkin

I support Kathleen Sullivan despite (a) strongly objecting to her interference with the then-County Manager and (b) not understanding at all her decision to "opt out" of the Linn County lawsuit. However, on balance, I feel that she should not be replaced by someone with no governmental experience. On the other hand, Ms. Sullivan definitely owes voters a detailed and rational explanation of where she stands on all the important issues. Postcards, flyers, and slogans don't cut it. I suggest she take the opportunity to counter this newspaper's recommendation against voting for her by publishing a "Point of View" op-ed.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.