I really enjoyed The Mouth's column in response to people who were less than happy with his reviews of local restaurants ("Reviewer responds to reader feedback," Coast Weekend, Oct. 29). I think these folks miss the point. Restaurant reviews are very subjective, depending on the reviewer's experience on that particular visit and their personal tastes.

I will use myself as an example of personal restaurant reviewing. First, I pay no attention to any professional reviewer's opinion for the aforementioned reason. If the restaurant is new, I will wait a couple of months before going so they have had time to work out any kinks. When I do go, and am dissatisfied, I just never go there again.

Returning to subjectivity, it happens that I have been to three of the places that The Mouth reviewed, and I totally agree with him on two out of three. But the other place, a more high-end restaurant, was given a rave review while my wife and I found the food just ordinary and over-priced. On the other hand, we went to a new Mexican place here on the Long Beach (Wash.) Peninsula, and absolutely hated it, but everybody we know who has been there loves it.

See what I mean about objectivity?


Ocean Park, Wash.


Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.